![jay abraham raising capital jay abraham raising capital](https://boutiquegrowth.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/The-Only-3-Ways-to-Grow-Your-Business.png)
![jay abraham raising capital jay abraham raising capital](https://img.youtube.com/vi/uawtB1_7zLU/mqdefault.jpg)
Austin similarly tried to assuage his hosts’ concerns with a long explication of the interests and defense agreements that still bind the United States to the Middle East. “This region is too important, too volatile, too interwoven with American interests to contemplate otherwise.”Īt the same conference, U.S. “The US is not going anywhere,” McGurk said. On Sunday, Brett McGurk, the National Security Council’s top official for the Middle East, tried to assure an audience of senior officials, advisers, analysts and influencers that Washington wasn’t going to repeat its Afghan pullout-and the chaotic conditions surrounding that withdrawal-in the Middle East.
JAY ABRAHAM RAISING CAPITAL FULL
This tension and the confusion it generates was on full display at this year’s Manama Dialogue, an annual forum organized by the International Institute for Strategic Studies in Bahrain’s capital. policymakers trying to craft this realignment-is Washington’s enormous military footprint in the region, which has persisted despite efforts across three administrations to deprioritize the Middle East in Washington’s strategic calculus. strategic interests in the long term.īut what makes this shift confusing-for regional governments as well as for U.S. In practice, that means a decrease in high-level attention and allocation of diplomatic and other resources in the short term, and a relegation of the region from the category of core U.S.
![jay abraham raising capital jay abraham raising capital](https://www.abraham.com/img/resources/3Debook-BusinessPhilo-laydown.jpg)
officials, Washington is downgrading the Middle East as a priority of U.S. Notwithstanding the protests of some U.S. policymakers face in seeking to exert influence in a region beset by poor governance and a multiplicity of state, nonstate and hybrid actors.īut it also reflects a paradox at the heart of U.S. The question speaks to the disconnect between Washington’s strategic interests in the Middle East and the priorities of its regional partners. officials feel compelled to constantly reassure their regional partners that the U.S. If Washington is as committed as ever to its historical role as security guarantor in the Middle East, why do U.S.